ARM NPTL support for uClibc

[Erik Andersen]

On Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 12:45:50PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> We'd suggest the following criteria:
> 
> - Does not break existing LinuxThreads and no-threads configurations,
>   as judged by the test suite.
> 
> - Works well enough on at least one target that any remaining fixes
>   will probably not require major infrastructure changes.
> 
> - Meets established uClibc coding conventions and good coding practice.

I agree with these criteria for inclusion.  I'm just finishing up
a project currently, and hope to (finally) have some time to
devote to uClibc this next week.  I'll be reviewing your patch at
that time.  I have no problem with merging NPTL into trunk, if it
meets the above criteria.  And of course it would be foolish to
let the existing work in the NPTL branch bitrot.  Now that sjhill
has his work checked in, merging your arm work with his mips
work, and getting the lot checked into truck, is a very high
priority item.  Esp since, as you note, this large of a patch
bitrots quickly.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--