Non thread safe primitives
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Wed Dec 6 11:16:12 PST 2006
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 04:53, John Zoidberg wrote:
> I've found some messages on the mailing list that uClibc is not thread safe
> http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/archive/4087.html (2001)
you found some pretty old messages
> But from here
> http://uclibc.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/uClibc/docs/threads.txt?rev2
>1&view=markup (2005)
> it seems at least the C standard library (I/O, malloc, errno, math,
> etc) part is fully thread safe, and for the primitives that aren't, a
> reentrant counterpart is provided. Am i wrong on this?
uClibc should only be as thread safe as POSIX requires ... so if a function is
not required to be reentrant, then generally there are _r versions
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://busybox.net/lists/uclibc/attachments/20061206/655282bb/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the uClibc
mailing list