Modified e500 patches

Steve Papacharalambous stevep at freescale.com
Fri Feb 2 02:30:06 PST 2007


Hi Jocke,

Yep, I can mail the patches in line in future.  The only reason that I
didn't do this originally was that I thought that the size of some of
the patches was a little too large to attach to emails.

Unfortunately they are all needed for e500 :-(

Best regards,

Steve

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 11:19 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Thanks
> 
> I will hopefully have some time this weekend to look at this. However I
> find it painful
> to search that big page for the patches. Can you, in the future, mail
> the patches(inline)
> to the list?
> 
> Before I start I want to know if all patches are required for e500 or if
> one can defer some of them to later? 
> 
>  Jocke
> 
> > From: Steve Papacharalambous [mailto:stevep at freescale.com] 
> > 
> > Hi Mike,
> > 
> > I've revised the patch to change UCLIBC_EXTRA_GCC_FLAGS to
> > UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS.  The revised patch can be downloaded from:
> > http://www.bitshrine.org/gpp/
> > 
> > Revised patch: uclibc-20070119-e500-libc-changes-01.patch
> > Replaces: uclibc-20070119-e500-libc-changes.patch
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:51 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 February 2007, Steve Papacharalambous wrote:
> > > > 2/ Add UCLIBC_EXTRA_GCC_FLAGS and remove hard coding e500 flags.
> > > 
> > > UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS
> > > -mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 



More information about the uClibc mailing list