0.9.28.3 ssp for gcc-4.1.2?

[Rogelio Serrano]

On 3/14/07, Kevin Day <thekevinday at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > > do we need to sync ssp in 0.9.28.3 to gcc-4.1.2?
> > >
> > > 0.9.28.3 uses __guard but 4.1.2 uses __stack_chk_guard
> >
> > yes and no ... the ssp support in uclibc is for gcc-3.x, but this wont be
> > fixed in 0.9.28.x
> >
> > it'll probably get merged from psm's work for trunk
> > -mike
> >
> What about the SSP in the upcoming 0.9.29?
> I imagine its for 4.x?
> Will there be options for both 3.x and 4.x?
>
> --
> Kevin Day
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>

I have cross compiled an hlfs system using uclibc snapshot and gcc
4.1.2. c++ locales are broken though among other broken stuff, but ssp
seems to be ok. i can build enough stuff for a self hosting system.
dont know if busybox will build with ssp though.

-- 
the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items