uClibc copyright and licence audit

[Kevin Day]

On 9/18/07, Mark Brown <broonie at sirena.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:57:22PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Monday 17 September 2007 8:22:23 am Simon Richter wrote:
>
> > > and interesting ways (for example, the LGPL stipulates that the build
> > > system is part of the source;
>
> > Where?
>
> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html
>
> > Could you point out the clause, please?
>
> In the definition of the term "Source code" in clause 0 it says:
>
>     For a library, complete source code means [...] plus the scripts
>     used to control compilation and installation of the library.
>
So what you are saying is that if some genious found a way to make
Microsoft Visual Studio C++ compile the uClibc source code, that would
suddenly put Microsoft Visual Studio C++ under the LGPL v2.1 license?
-- 
Kevin Day